Some basic premises – typically designed by leaders and supported by the LED – exercise the collective conscience of the LED in to this point as they stimulate a willed development. The event is sometimes superior however not essentially civilized. The premises in question area unit of this form: “Our level of technological advancement is second to none. Upon reaching this level, we have a tendency to even have to organize our society for peace, and to ensure the peace, technology should be revised to foster the policy of war.” Technological advancement that’s pushed during this direction sets a dangerous precedent for alternative societies that worry a threat to their individual sovereignties. They’re pushed to conjointly foster a war technology.
In the domain of civilization, this mode of development isn’t laudable, neither is it virtuously excusable. Since it’s not virtuously excusable, it’s socially head-in-the-clouds. Associate in Nursing review of the premises can reveal that it’s the last one that poses a tangle. The last premise is that the conclusion of 2 preceding premises however isn’t in any means logically deduced. What it shows may be a stormily deduced conclusion, and being therefore, it fails to be reckoned as a conclusion from a rationally ready mind, a minimum of at the time at that it had been deduced.
A society that advances per the higher than presuppositions – and particularly per the illogical conclusion – has transmitted the psyche of non-negotiable superiority to its folks. All along, the facility of passion dictates the pace of human conduct. whether or not in constructive engagements or willed partnerships, the principle of equality fails to figure exactly owing to the prevalence syndrome that grips the leader and also the LED. And a unique society that refuses to share within the collective sensibilities or passion of such society has, by the expected logic, become potential} or actual enemy and faces confrontation on all possible fronts.
Most of what we have a tendency to find out about this world, of course, via the media, is dominated by progressive technology. Societies that have the foremost of such technology are, time and once more, claimed to be the foremost advanced. It’s not solely their advancement that lifts them to the head of power, superiority, and fame. They’ll conjointly use technology to alter Associate in Nursingd move forward an understanding of life and nature in a very totally different direction, a direction that tends to eliminate, the maximum amount as doable, a previous association between life and nature that was, in several respects, mystical and unsafe. This last purpose doesn’t essentially mean that technological advancement may be a mark of a superior civilization.
What we want to understand is that civilization and technology don’t seem to be connubial terms. Civilized folks might have a sophisticated technology or they’ll not have it. Civilization isn’t simply a matter of science and technology or technical infrastructure, or, again, the marvel of buildings; it conjointly should do with the ethical and mental reflexes of individuals moreover as their level of social connectedness at intervals their own society and on the far side. It’s from the overall behaviour makeup of individuals that each one styles of physical structures may well be created, therefore too the question of science and technology. Thus, the sort of bridges, roads, buildings, serious machinery, among others, that we are able to see in a very society may tell, in a very general means, the activity pattern of the folks. Activity pattern may conjointly tell plenty regarding the extent to that the natural surroundings has been utilised for infrastructural activities, science and technology. Above all, activity pattern may tell plenty regarding the perceptions and understanding of the folks regarding others.
I do believe – and, I think, the general public do believe – that upon fast the speed of infrastructural activities and technology, the surroundings should recede in its naturalness. Once advancing technology (and its attendant structures or ideas) competes with the inexperienced surroundings for area, this surroundings that homes trees, grass, flowers, all types of animals and fish should shrink in size. However the expansion of population, the relentless human searching for quality life, the requirement to regulate life while not betting on the unpredictable condition of the natural surroundings prompt the employment of technology. Technology needn’t create unwarranted danger to the natural surroundings. it’s the misuse of technology that’s in question. whereas a society might justly utilize technology to boost quality of life, its folks even have to ask: “how abundant technology will we ought to safeguard the natural surroundings?” Suppose society Y blends the moderate use of technology with the natural environment so as to offset the reckless destruction of the latter, then this sort of positioning prompts the purpose that society Y may be a lover of the principle of balance. From this principle, one will with boldness conclude that society Y favours stability quite chaos, and has, therefore, the sense of ethical and social responsibility. Any progressive technology points to the sophistication of the human mind, and it indicates that the natural surroundings has been disdainfully tamed.
If humans don’t wish to measure at the mercy of the natural surroundings – that, of course, is Associate in Nursing unsure means of life – however per their own foretold pace, then the employment of technology may be a matter in fact. It might appear that the principle of balance that society Y has chosen may solely be for a brief whereas or that this can be a lot of of a make-believe position than a true one. For once the facility of the human mind gratifies itself following a big accomplishment in technology, retreat, or, at best, a slow-down is kind of uncommon. it’s as if the human mind is telling itself: “technological advancement should accelerate with none obstruction. A retreat or a gradual method is Associate in Nursing insult to the inquiring mind.” This sort of thought method solely points out the enigma of the mind, its dark aspect, not its finest space. And in seeking to interrogate this mode of a particular technology per the directions of the mind, the role of ethics is indispensable.
Is it virtuously right to use this sort of technology for this sort of product? And is it virtuously right to use this sort of product? each queries hint that the merchandise or merchandise in question area unit either harmful or not, environmentally friendly or not, or that they are doing not solely cause hurt on to humans however on to the surroundings too. And if, as I actually have expressed, the aim of technology is to boost the standard of life, then to use technology to supply merchandise that hurt each humans and also the natural surroundings contradicts the aim of technology, Associate in Nursingd it conjointly falsifies an assertion that humans area unit rational. moreover, it suggests that the subtle level that the human mind has reached is unable to know the essence or principle of quality life. During this regard, a peaceful beingness with the natural surroundings would are deserted for the sake of Associate in Nursing unrestrained, inquiring human mind. The human mind would, as it were, become corrupted with beliefs or ideas that area unit indefensible in any range of the way.
The support that’s done by environmentalists relate to the question of environmental degradation and its negative consequences on humans. They insist that there’s no justification for manufacturing sophisticated merchandise that hurt each humans and also the natural surroundings. This competition sounds persuasive. engineering might demonstrate the peak of human accomplishment, however it’s going to not purpose to ethical and social responsibility. And to the current purpose, the question is also asked: “In what ways that will humans shut the gap between unrestrained engineering and environmental degradation?”
Too often, most up-to-date humans tend to assume that a classy way is preferred to an easy one. The previous is supported by the burden of engineering, the latter is usually not. the previous eases the burden of relying an excessive amount of on the dictates of the natural surroundings, the latter doesn’t. The latter tends to hunt a dependent relationship with the natural surroundings, the previous doesn’t. whether or not human comfort ought to return mostly from a sophisticated technology or the natural surroundings isn’t a matter that would be simply answered. If the natural surroundings is shrinking because of growth and alternative inevitable causes, then advanced technology is needed to alleviate the pressures to human comfort that arise. It’s the head-in-the-clouds proliferation of, say, war technology, sophisticated merchandise, among others, that area unit in want of criticism and need to stop.
Mr. Ainsah-Mensah has worked in varied capacities principally in North American country and currently in China. He’s Associate in Nursing education and race relations adviser, comes arranger, writer, and post-secondary educator in business courses, life skills, and demanding thinking. He’s presently the principal of Handan-Lilac Education cluster in China.